Categories
Anesthesia Education Business/Finances Leadership & Practice Management Leadership in Emergencies Preparing for Grad School/Residency

#119 – Psychological Safety & Just Culture

Yo yo! Today, we close out our 3-part series on systems thinking with this episode on psychological safety & just culture.

Part 1 (Episode 117) introduced systems thinking & high reliability organizations.

Part 2 (Episode 118) walked through resilience engineering, safety differently and synesis.

Part 3 (this episode) threads these topics together with psychological safety & just culture.

This three part series invites you to think about your home team and professional practice.

How does your team handle errors & mistakes? Are you safe to fail and be honest about mistakes & near misses? Are mistakes and mishaps talked about?

Do you usually take feedback well and look for ways to grow or get defensive and think it’s always someone else’s fault? What about the other folks on your team?

Psychological safety is about the freedom to speak up without fear of embarrassment or punishment. Psychological safety doesn’t just happen. Organizational leaders need to talk about it and normalize it – truly, make it part of your team norms. Psychological safety doesn’t skirt accountability. Accountability is a key part of a psychologically safe culture. We’ll talk more about it in the show.

Just culture extends the idea of psychological safety to the organizational environment and the team’s approach to errors and mistakes. Just culture encourages teams to look at systems factors for why things break down. People don’t make mistakes willfully. Willful harm with malicious intent is recklessness or sabotage. That’s not a mistake. Mistakes are always unintentional because people don’t show up to work planning how they’re going to accidentally drop the ball and screw things up. Just culture looks at mistakes from the standpoint that perhaps the system is broken and sets frontline staff up for failure. A systems fix is like a rising tide that lifts all boats. Just culture sees the systems as the usual point of failure, not the frontline worker. Front line workers are often the source of resilience and capacity within systems.

We talk about these things and more in the podcast as we thread all three parts of this series together.

As a reminder, I’ll be in Hilton Head, SC next month teaching with Encore Symposiums and back at the Cliff House in Maine this October with Encore. Come check us out if you’re looking for a great continuing education conference!

Your values build your system, your system creates your culture, your culture generates your results.

References

Batalden, P. a. C., E. (2015). Like Magic? (“Every system is perfectly designed…”). Institute for Healthcare Improvement https://www.ihi.org/insights/magic-every-system-perfectly-designed?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Conklin, T. (2025). PAPod 540 – Swiss Cheese Actually In PreAccident Investigation Podcast.https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/preaccident-investigation-podcast/id962990192?i=1000702329202

Dekker, S. (2016). Just culture: Balancing safety and accountability. crc Press. 

Dekker, S. W., & Leveson, N. G. (2015). The systems approach to medicine: controversy and misconceptions. BMJ quality & safety, 24(1), 7-9. 

Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons. 

Edmondson, A. C. (2023). Right kind of wrong: The science of failing well. Simon and Schuster. 

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons. 

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business. 

Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. John Wiley & Sons. 

Willink, J. (2017, February 2, 2017). Extreme Ownership TEDx, TEDx Talks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljqra3BcqWM

Categories
Business/Finances Leadership & Practice Management Leadership in Emergencies Preparing for Grad School/Residency

#118 – Resilience Engineering, Safety Differently & Synesis

This is Part 2 of a 3 part series on organizational development – how we work and live together as teams in healthcare so we can do our best work, master our craft, take amazing care of patients and actually enjoy the work we do. (no big deal)

In the first part (Episode 117), we talked about systems thinking and patterns of high reliability organizations (HROs). Systems thinking helps us zoom out to consider the complexity of situations and the various levers that influence outcomes. High reliability organizations adopt specific systems thinking practices to achieve consistent success in safety-critical, complex environments.

Resilience engineering builds on systems thinking and HRO theory by teaching us how to develop adaptive capacity, build for success (not just avoiding error) and bounce back when things don’t go well. Safety differently is about seeing safety as not the absence of mistakes and errors but the capacity for the right thing to happen. It also recasts the worker not as the weak link in a complex system (the point of failure), but as the source of resilience and capacity. Front-line healthcare workers – you and me – are often the ones who find the workarounds and get the job done despite suboptimal conditions.

No one shows up to their job with the intention to make mistakes, get hurt or put patients at risk. Mistakes are always unintentional. Willful acts of harm are something totally different. Blaming and shaming workers (forms of punishment & embarrassment) are counterproductive and stem from leaders who do not understand what’s actually going on or the best ways to run their organizations and build thriving teams.

Synesis, which sounds like a scary word, stems from the same Greek word that system and synergy come from and is actually kind of a cool idea. It’s the way we balance the often competing interests of productivity, safety, reliability and quality. We need to figure out how to do all of these things concurrently in healthcare. I’ll share some stories and examples of how to do that as an anesthesia provider in this episode.

So that’s where we’re headed with this podcast!

In Part 3, we’ll come back and talk about psychological safety and just culture, which thread all three episodes in this little mini-series together.

As a reminder, I’m teaching with Encore Symposiums next month in Hilton Head, South Carolina and back at the Cliff House in Maine this October. If you’re looking for a continuing education conference where we’ll talk more about all of this – or if you’re a resident or graduate student looking to check off one of your state/national meetings, come check us out! I’d love to see you there!

As always, you can come work with us at MaineHealth – Maine Medical Center. We have a phenomenal team of CRNAs, physician anesthesiologists, surgeons, OR nurses & CSTs, anesthesia techs and admin specialists. If you want to be part of a growing team of providers doing world class work at a level 1 trauma center in a spectacular city, check us out!

References

Batalden, P. a. C., E. (2015). Like Magic? (“Every system is perfectly designed…”). Institute for Healthcare Improvement https://www.ihi.org/insights/magic-every-system-perfectly-designed?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Conklin, T. (2025). PAPod 540 – Swiss Cheese Actually In PreAccident Investigation Podcast.https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/preaccident-investigation-podcast/id962990192?i=1000702329202

Epstein, R. M., & Krasner, M. S. (2013). Physician resilience: what it means, why it matters, and how to promote it. Academic Medicine, 88(3), 301-303. 

Hollnagel, E. (2020). Synesis: the unification of productivity, quality, safety and reliability. Routledge. 

Larouzee, J., & Le Coze, J.-C. (2020). Good and bad reasons: The Swiss cheese model and its critics. Safety science, 126, 104660. 

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business. 

Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011). High reliability organizations (HROs). Best practice & Research clinical anaesthesiology, 25(2), 133-144. 

Wears, R., & Sutcliffe, K. (2019). Still not safe: patient safety and the middle-managing of American medicine. Oxford University Press. 

Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. John Wiley & Sons. 

World Health Organization. (2021). Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care (9240032703). 

Categories
Anesthesia Education Anesthesia Equipment and Technology Clinical Tips Leadership in Emergencies Preparing for Grad School/Residency

#97 – Safety is a capacity

What up folks! This is another short podcast on the idea that safety is a capacity, not an outcome. This idea comes out of Todd Conklin & Sidney Dekker’s work on organizational safety where they discuss two ways of looking at safety:

The Safety 1 Perspective or the old way of thinking is that safety is about minimizing errors.  It’s about identifying risks, including human behaviors, and implementing steps to prevent errors from happening.  Success is often measured in low to zero error rates and errors are punishable offenses.  

The Safety 2 Perspective doesn’t overlook the need to minimize errors.  But it focuses on building the capacity for the right thing to happen versus a feverish focus on whack-a-moling potential risk and, frankly, whack-a-moling the people who make mistakes.

The idea is that safety is not an outcome but rather a capacity that’s built up over time through thoughtful design of systems and careful handling of people and systems both when things go right as well as when errors happen.  It’s about figuring out how humans are doing the work – including all of their workarounds – in order to generate successful outcomes and finding ways to support and foster positive outcomes on a consistent basis.  And when things go wrong, people aren’t punished.  While egregious error or outright negligence is always possible, Safety 2 presumes people are smart and are trying to do the right thing.  So if something goes wrong, there is likely a system input, factor or design that created a high probability that something would in fact go wrong.  So the focus is on understanding how the worker performed in a faulty system and trying to improve that system so there’s a higher likelihood that the right thing happens the next time around.

Check out the short podcast for a couple of illuminating stories to bring these principles to life. As always, drop me an email or message on social media if you’d like to connect!

Resources:

Todd Conklin’s Pre-Accident Investigation podcast

Sidney Dekker’s professional website

Upcoming conferences I’m speaking at:

Maine Association of Nurse Anesthesiology: https://meana.org MEANA Fall Conference in Portland, Maine (virtual option available)

Encore Symposium’s New England at the Cliff House, Cape Neddick, Maine October 16-19, 2023

Encore Symposium’s Autumn in Bar Harbor & Acadia National Park, October 14-17, 2024